Current pilot offer
Turn stale ATS records into a usable shortlist in 7 days.
For staffing and recruiting firms with candidate data nobody trusts enough to start with. One live req in. One clear readout back.
Pilot snapshot
This is meant to be a believable first proof step, not the start of a giant software project.
Why the scope is narrow
Best fit
Staffing and recruiting firms with Bullhorn or Crelate data nobody trusts enough to start with.
What it solves
Stale records, weak contact data, duplicate profiles, and no clear reuse path for one live req.
What you are not buying
Not a new ATS. Not a giant implementation. Not black-box ranking with no explanation.
What you send
What you get back
What is not included
How the sprint runs
One proof step, not a maze.
Export a small sample
One req and 250 stale records is enough to test the shape.
Run the audit
We pressure-test the data, the match logic, and the obvious blockers.
Review the output
You get the shortlist, the findings, and the next action in plain English.
Decide what deserves more
Use it internally, scope a follow-on build, or stop there.
Sample readout
Candidate Recovery Audit
What we found
- Search starts outside the ATS because stale records feel risky.
- Contact decay is high enough to hurt reactivation without cleanup.
- The sample still contains enough signal to produce a useful shortlist.
Recommended next action
Clean the highest-signal subset, score against one live req, and keep the recruiter in approval before any outreach goes out.
Pilot terms
Simple, narrow, and paid.
The paid pilot is $2,500 for one live req and 250 stale candidate records. The output is the audit, the shortlist, and the drafts. The goal is to pressure-test the workflow, not to force a longer project before the first proof step exists.
Data handling
Plain-English trust terms.
FAQ
Questions buyers usually ask first.
Do you need full ATS access?
No. The pilot is intentionally CSV-first. A later implementation step can be scoped separately if it is worth doing.
Can we redact data first?
Yes. Reduced or redacted samples are fine as long as there is enough signal to assess the workflow.
What if we already use Bullhorn or Crelate AI?
That is fine. The point is to pressure-test whether your current setup is producing usable recruiting output from stale records.
What happens after the sprint?
You can use the findings internally, ask for a follow-on implementation scope, or stop. The pilot is designed to stand on its own.
Next step
If it is relevant, start with a small sample.
One req. One export. One useful answer about whether stale data is still worth something.